Rhythm analysis and charging during chest compressions reduces compression pause time

R Partridge; Q Tan; A Silver; M Riley; F Geheb; R Raymond

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.025

Rhythm analysis and charging during chest compressions reduces compression pause time

Resuscitation. 2015 May:90:133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.025. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

Authors

R Partridge¹, Q Tan², A Silver², M Riley², F Geheb², R Raymond³

Affiliations

¹ Emerson Hospital, Concord, MA, USA. Electronic address: Robert_Partridge_MD@brown.edu.
² ZOLL Medical, Chelmsford, MA, USA.
³ Armstrong Ambulance, Arlington, MA, USA.

PMID: 25772540
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.025

Abstract

Purpose: Prolonged chest compression interruptions immediately preceding and following a defibrillation shock reduce shock success and survival after cardiac arrest. We tested the hypothesis that compression pauses would be shorter using an AED equipped with a new Analysis during Compressions with Fast Reconfirmation (ADC-FR) technology, which features automated rhythm analysis and charging during compressions with brief reconfirmation analysis during compression pause, compared with standard AED mode.

Methods: BLS-certified emergency medical technicians (EMTs) worked in pairs and performed two trials of simulated cardiac resuscitation with a chest compression sensing X Series defibrillator (ZOLL Medical). Each pair was randomized to perform a trial of eight 2-min compression intervals (randomly assigned to receive four shockable and four non-shockable rhythms) with the defibrillator in standard AED mode and another trial in ADC-FR mode. Subjects were advised to follow defibrillator prompts, defibrillate if "shock advised," and switch compressors every two intervals. Compression quality data were reviewed using RescueNet Code Review (ZOLL Medical) and analyzed using paired t-tests.

Results: Thirty-two EMT-basic prehospital providers (59% male; median 25 years age [IQR 22-27]) participated in the study. End of interval compression interruptions were significantly reduced with ADC-FR vs. AED mode (p<0.001). For shockable rhythms, pre-shock pause was reduced significantly with ADC-FR compared with AED use (7.35±0.16s vs. 12.0±0.22s, p<0.001) whereas post-shock pause was similar (2.08±0.14s vs. 1.77±0.14s, p=0.1).

Conclusion: Chest compression interruptions associated with rhythm analysis and charging are reduced with use of a novel defibrillator technology, ADC-FR, which features automated rhythm analysis and charging during compressions.

Keywords: AED; Cardiac resuscitation; Cardiac rhythm analysis; Chest compressions.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / methods*
Defibrillators*
Electric Countershock / methods*
Emergency Medical Technicians
Equipment Design
Female
Humans
Male
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest / therapy*
Random Allocation
Tachycardia, Ventricular / therapy
Ventricular Fibrillation / therapy
Young Adult