The Cost-Utility of Total Hip Arthroplasty: Earlier Intervention, Improved Economics

J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jun;30(6):945-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.028. Epub 2015 Jan 10.

Abstract

We estimated the cost of Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years gained according to preoperative disease severity. We studied 159 primary unilateral THA, mean follow-up: 4 years. A median split of preoperative WOMAC scores was done to set apart a low (better) and a high (worse) score group. The groups with worse preoperative WOMAC were consistently associated with a less cost-effective intervention. The highest mean cost-effectiveness was achieved by patients with better WOMAC-total ($8256.32/QALY-gained). As patients aged, the cost-effectiveness of THA decreased. Patients 75 years of age or older and with worse scores had the least cost-effective interventions ($25,937.33/QALY-gained). THA remains a very cost-effective intervention even when performed in older "sicker" patients. Waiting for the patient to deteriorate will make the intervention more "expensive".

Keywords: QALY; cost-effectiveness; cost–utility analysis; preoperative; quality of life; total hip arthroplasty.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / economics*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Joint Diseases / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years*
  • Time Factors
  • United States / epidemiology