Syndecan-4 Regulates Muscle Differentiation and Is Internalized from the Plasma Membrane during Myogenesis

PLoS One. 2015 Jun 12;10(6):e0129288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129288. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

The cell surface proteoglycan syndecan-4 has been reported to be crucial for muscle differentiation, but the molecular mechanisms still remain to be fully understood. During in vitro differentiation of bovine muscle cells immunocytochemical analyses showed strong labelling of syndecan-4 intracellularly, in close proximity with Golgi structures, in membranes of intracellular vesicles and finally, in the nuclear area including the nuclear envelope. Chase experiments showed that syndecan-4 was internalized from the plasma membrane during this process. Furthermore, when syndecan-4 was knocked down by siRNA more myotubes were formed, and the expression of myogenic transcription factors, β1-integrin and actin was influenced. However, when bovine muscle cells were treated with a cell-penetrating peptide containing the cytoplasmic region of syndecan-4, myoblast fusion and thus myotube formation was blocked, both in normal cells and in syndecan-4 knock down cells. Altogether this suggests that the cytoplasmic domain of syndecan-4 is important in regulation of myogenesis. The internalization of syndecan-4 from the plasma membrane during muscle differentiation and the nuclear localization of syndecan-4 in differentiated muscle cells may be part of this regulation, and is a novel aspect of syndecan biology which merits further studies.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Amino Acid Sequence
  • Animals
  • Cattle
  • Cell Differentiation*
  • Cell Membrane / metabolism*
  • Cells, Cultured
  • Molecular Sequence Data
  • Muscle Development*
  • Muscle Fibers, Skeletal / cytology
  • Muscle Fibers, Skeletal / metabolism*
  • Protein Structure, Tertiary
  • Protein Transport
  • Syndecan-4 / chemistry
  • Syndecan-4 / genetics
  • Syndecan-4 / metabolism*

Substances

  • Syndecan-4

Grants and funding

This work was supported by grants from the Fund for Research Levy on Agricultural Products in Norway, the Norwegian Research Council (203697/O99) and the Throne Holst Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.