Responsibility for follow-up of abnormal findings in myocardial perfusion imaging: A case-based ethics discussion

J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Oct;22(5):927-31. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0232-2. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

Renee Bullock-Palmer¹, Andrew Kontak², Neal W Dickert^{3

4

5}, Leslee J Shaw^{3

6}, Vasken Dilsizian⁷, Thomas A Holly⁸, Jamshid Shirani⁹, Sharmila Dorbala¹⁰, Andrew J Einstein^{2

11}

¹ Department of Cardiology, Deborah Heart and Lung Hospital Center, Browns Mills, NJ, USA. renee.palmer@gmail.com.
² Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
³ Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
⁴ Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
⁵ Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, GA, USA.
⁶ Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
⁷ Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
⁸ Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
⁹ Department of Cardiology, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
¹⁰ Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Departments of Radiology and Medicine (Cardiology), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
¹¹ Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

No abstract available

Publication types