Abdominal aortic aneurysm anatomic severity grading score predicts implant-related complications, systemic complications, and mortality

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study was to examine the predictive value of the anatomic severity grading (ASG) score for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) on implant-related complications, systemic complications, and mortality at 30-day and midterm, defined as 2 years, follow-up assessments.

Methods: Patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair for infrarenal AAAs between 2009 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed, and ASG scores were calculated from three-dimensonal computed tomography reconstructions. Two independent patient groups were created: those with a low ASG score (score <14) and those with a high ASG score (score ≥14).

Results: We identified 190 patients (77% male), with a mean age of 73 years, and 84% Caucasian, with 104 patients in the low-score group and 86 in the high-score group. Within 30 days of the index endovascular aneurysm repair, 10 implant-related complications occurred in six patients (3%) and 25 systemic complications in 18 (9%). The incidence of 30-day implant-related complications was not significantly different between the low-score group (2 [2%]) and the high-score group (4 [5%]; P = .41). The incidence of patients with 30-day systemic complications was significantly different between the low-score group (5 [5%]) and the high score group (13 [15%]; P = .023). A composite end point of combined implant-related and systemic complications at 30 days showed there was a statistically significant difference between the low-score (7 [7%]) and high-score group (17 [20%]; P = .007). At a midterm follow up of 26 months (range, 1-64 months), implant-related complications occurred in 21 patients (11%), and systemic complications occurred in 29 (15%). The incidence of implant-related complications was significantly different between the low-score group (7 [7%]) and the high-score group (14 [16%]; P = .037). The incidence of midterm systemic complications was significantly different between the low-score group (11 [11%]) and the high-score group (18 [21%]; P = .048). A composite end point of combined implant-related and systemic complications at midterm follow-up resulted in a statistically significant difference between the low-score group (16 [15%]) and the high-score group (26 [30%]; P = .014). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the low-score group had fewer overall complications (combined implant-related and systemic) at 1 year (14% vs 34%) and 2 years (15% vs 45%) compared with the high-score group (P < .001). The low-scoring group also had significantly higher survival at 1 year (96% vs 86%) and 2 years (88% vs 84%) compared with the high-score group (P = .047).

Conclusions: The AAA ASG score can be used to predict patients at risk for midterm implant-related complications, 30-day and midterm systemic complications, and all-cause mortality.