Inborn errors of metabolism. Sensitivity of screening tests in high risk patients

Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1989 Nov;28(11):494-7. doi: 10.1177/000992288902801101.

Abstract

We estimated the sensitivity of a screening procedure (SP) for inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) in 566 referred, high-risk patients. The 143 (25.3% of the total sample) patients with initial abnormal results in at least one screening test (ST) were recalled for further investigations. An IEM was diagnosed in 40.6 percent of the 106 patients who came for reevaluation. In 114 of the remaining 423 patients who had normal initial ST, an IEM was still suspected on basis of clinical, radiological, and/or laboratory findings and was confirmed in 30 of such patients (5.3% of the total sample and 7.1% of the patients with normal results in the SP). The sensitivity of the SP was estimated maximally as 67.4 percent and the efficiency as 80.4 percent. Twenty-five of the 30 cases undetected with the SP were patients with sphingolipidoses. The simple inclusion of thin-layer chromatography of urinary oligosaccharides in the SP should allow the detection of at least one half of these cases, increasing its sensitivity by 14.1 percent and its efficiency by 4.6 percent. In at least 7.1 percent of patients with an initial normal ST, an IEM was detected. These would have remained undiagnosed if the limitations of the SP employed had not been fully understood.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • False Negative Reactions
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Male
  • Mass Screening*
  • Metabolism, Inborn Errors / diagnosis*
  • Metabolism, Inborn Errors / epidemiology
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Sensitivity and Specificity