Background: The impact of revascularization on recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in patients with coronary artery disease and relatively preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is unknown.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of revascularization on recurrent VAs or death.
Methods: A cohort study was conducted on consecutive patients with prior myocardial infarction and LVEF ≥40% presenting with a first clinical sustained VA in the absence of an acute coronary syndrome. The impact of revascularization on recurrent VAs and all-cause mortality was assessed.
Results: A total of 274 patients (mean age 66.1 ± 9.7 years, 85.4% male, mean LVEF 48.3% ± 7.2%) were included in the study. Eight-eight patients (32.1%) underwent coronary revascularization. During mean follow-up of 6.2 ± 5.1 years, 140 (51.1%) died or had recurrent sustained VAs or appropriate implantable-cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Revascularization was not associated with a significantly lower rate of recurrent VAs or death (multivariable hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-1.24, P = .43) regardless of whether it was complete or incomplete (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.25-1.69, P = .37) or was performed by percutaneous or surgical means (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.53-1.94, P = .96). An implantable-cardioverter defibrillator was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09-0.55, P = .001).
Conclusion: Patients with prior myocardial infarction and LVEF ≥40% who present with sustained VAs in the absence of an acute coronary syndrome remain at high risk for recurrent VAs and all-cause death. Coronary revascularization does not systemically mitigate this risk.
Keywords: Coronary artery disease; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Ventricular tachycardia.
Copyright © 2016 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.