Impact on outcome of different types of carotid stent: results from the European Registry of Carotid Artery Stenting

EuroIntervention. 2016 Jun 12;12(2):e265-70. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I2A41.

Abstract

Aims: Conflicting data exist on the impact on outcome of the use of different stent types during carotid artery stenting (CAS). The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes according to different carotid stent design among the population of the European Registry of Carotid Artery Stenting (ERCAS).

Methods and results: The present study was conducted in 1,604 patients who underwent neuroprotected CAS in ERCAS. All types of commercially available carotid stent were used. Open-cell design stents were classified according to free cell area into <7.5 mm2 or >7.5 mm2. A total of 713 closed-cell, 456 hybrid-cell, 238 <7.5 mm2 open-cell, and 197 >7.5 mm2 open-cell stents were implanted. Overall, the 30-day stroke and death rate was 1.37%. At 30 days, 19 strokes occurred (1.18%): eight in the group of patients treated with a closed-cell (1.12%), two in those with a hybrid-cell (0.44%), three in those with a <7.5 mm2 open-cell (1.26%), and six in those treated with a >7.5 mm2 open-cell stent (3.05%) (p=0.045).

Conclusions: Data of the present study suggest that, in the setting of neuroprotected CAS performed in high-volume centres by properly trained operators, the use of an open-cell design stent with a free cell area >7.5 mm2 may be associated with an increased 30-day stroke risk.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Angioplasty / instrumentation
  • Angioplasty / methods
  • Carotid Artery Diseases / therapy*
  • Carotid Stenosis / therapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Registries
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Stents* / adverse effects
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome