A Case for Less Intensive Blood Pressure Control: It Matters to Achieve Target Blood Pressure Early and Sustained Below 140/90mmHg

Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Nov-Dec;59(3):209-218. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

Abstract

Although high blood pressure (BP) is the leading risk factors for cardiovascular (CV) disease, the optimal BP treatment target in order to reduce CV risk is unclear in the aftermath of the SPRINT study. The aim of this review is to assess large, randomized, and controlled trials on BP targets, as well as review selected observational analyses from other large randomized BP trials in order to evaluate the benefit of intense vs. standard BP control. None of the studies, except SPRINT, favored intense BP treatment. Some of the studies suggested favorable effects of lowering treatment target in patients with diabetes or high risk of stroke. In SPRINT, a new BP measurement method was introduced, and the results must be interpreted in light of this. The results of the observational analyses indicated the best preventive effect when achieving early and sustained BP control rather than low targets. In conclusion, today's guidelines' recommended treatment target of <140/90mmHg seems sufficient for most patients. Early and sustained BP control should be the main focus.

Keywords: Blood pressure; Blood pressure target; Cardiovascular disease; Clinical trial; Hypertension.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Antihypertensive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Blood Pressure / drug effects
  • Humans
  • Hypertension / drug therapy*
  • Patient Care Planning

Substances

  • Antihypertensive Agents