Fixed dynamometry is more sensitive than vital capacity or ALS rating scale

Muscle Nerve. 2017 Oct;56(4):710-715. doi: 10.1002/mus.25586. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

Abstract

Introduction: Improved outcome measures are essential to efficiently screen the growing number of potential amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) therapies.

Methods: This longitudinal study of 100 (70 male) participants with ALS compared Accurate Test of Limb Isometric Strength (ATLIS), using a fixed, wireless load cell, with ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and vital capacity (VC).

Results: Participants enrolled at 5 U.S. sites. Data were analyzed from 66 participants with complete ATLIS, ALSFRS-R, and VC data over at least 3 visits. Change in ATLIS was less variable both within- and among-person than change in ALSFRS-R or VC. Additionally, participants who had normal ALSFRS-R arm and leg function averaged 12 to 32% below expected strength values measured by ATLIS.

Conclusions: ATLIS was more sensitive to change than ALSFRS-R or VC and could decrease sample size requirements by approximately one-third. The ability of ATLIS to detect prefunctional change has potential value in early trials. Muscle Nerve 56: 710-715, 2017.

Keywords: ALS; ALSFRS-R; longitudinal; outcome measure; strength; vital capacity.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis / diagnosis*
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis / physiopathology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Isometric Contraction / physiology
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Muscle Strength / physiology
  • Muscle Strength Dynamometer / standards*
  • Vital Capacity / physiology*