Early infectious outcomes after addition of fluoroquinolone or aminoglycoside to posttrauma antibiotic prophylaxis in combat-related open fracture injuries

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Nov;83(5):854-861. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001609.

Abstract

Background: We examined combat-related open extremity fracture infections as a function of whether posttrauma antimicrobial prophylaxis included expanded Gram-negative (EGN) coverage.

Methods: Military personnel with open extremity fractures sustained in Iraq and Afghanistan (2009-2014) who transferred to participating hospitals in the United States were assessed. The analysis was restricted to patients with a U.S. hospitalization period of ≥7 days. Prophylaxis was classified as narrow (e.g., IV cefazolin, clindamycin, and/or amoxicillin-clavulanate) or EGN, if the prophylactic regimen included fluoroquinolones and/or aminoglycosides.

Results: The study population included 1,044 patients, of which 585 (56%) and 459 (44%) received narrow and EGN coverage, respectively (p < 0.001). Skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) were more common among patients who received narrow prophylaxis compared to EGN coverage (28% vs. 22%; p = 0.029), whereas osteomyelitis rates were comparable between regimens (8%). Similar findings were noted when endpoints were measured at 2 and 4 weeks postinjury. There was no significant difference related to length of hospitalization between narrow and EGN regimens (median: 34 and 32 days, respectively) or operating room visits (median: 5 and 4). A higher proportion of EGN coverage patients had Gram-negative organisms isolated that were not susceptible to fluoroquinolones and/or aminoglycosides (49% vs. 40%; p < 0.001). In a Cox proportional model, narrow prophylaxis was independently associated with an increased risk of extremity SSTIs (hazard ratio: 1.41; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-1.83).

Discussion: Despite seeing a small benefit with EGN coverage related to a reduction of SSTIs, it does not decrease the risk of osteomyelitis, and there seems to be a cost of increased antibiotic resistance associated with use. Overall, our findings support the current post-combat trauma antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines, which recommend the use of cefazolin or clindamycin with open fractures.

Level of evidence: Prognostic/Epidemiological, Level II; Therapy, level IV.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Afghan Campaign 2001-
  • Aminoglycosides / therapeutic use*
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis*
  • Cefazolin / therapeutic use
  • Clindamycin / therapeutic use
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Fluoroquinolones / therapeutic use*
  • Fractures, Open / complications
  • Fractures, Open / drug therapy*
  • Fractures, Open / microbiology
  • Humans
  • Injury Severity Score
  • Iraq War, 2003-2011
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Military Personnel*
  • Osteomyelitis / etiology
  • Osteomyelitis / prevention & control
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Skin Diseases, Infectious / etiology
  • Skin Diseases, Infectious / prevention & control
  • Soft Tissue Infections / etiology
  • Soft Tissue Infections / prevention & control
  • United States

Substances

  • Aminoglycosides
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Fluoroquinolones
  • Clindamycin
  • Cefazolin