To evaluate the impact of an institutional protocol on patterns of use and outcomes of inferior vena cava filters (IVCF). Following a multidisciplinary effort, an institutional protocol involving dedicated follow-up of patients receiving IVCF and a physician education program regarding IVCF utilization, was established. We prospectively collected data of patients who received IVCF during 2015-2016, following protocol implementation (POST group). For comparison, we reviewed records of patients who received IVCF during 2009-2014, before implementation of the institutional protocol (PRE group). In the PRE and POST groups, 76 and 38 IVCF per year were inserted respectively, with an overall decrease of 50%. IVCF were more likely to be placed for therapeutic rather than prophylactic indications in the POST compared to the PRE group (P = 0.003). Follow-up rates at our coagulation clinic were significantly higher in the POST than the PRE group (100 vs. 22.9%, P < 0.0001), as were rates of attempted retrieval: 60.5% (23/38) vs. 16.7% (76/455), P < 0.0001. Failed retrieval occurred at similar rates: 15.8% (12/76) vs. 18.2% (4/22), P = 0.75. There was a trend towards a lower thrombotic complication rate in the POST than the PRE group: 2.6 vs. 11.2%, P = 0.16. Implementation of an institutional protocol significantly decreased the use of IVCF and increased the retrieval rate. Such intervention could potentially lead to lower rates of IVCF-related complications in the future.
Keywords: Deep vein thrombosis; Filter retrieval; Inferior vena cava filter; Institutional protocol; Pulmonary embolism.