Introduction: Personnel rescuing survivors from a pressurized, distressed Royal Australian Navy (RAN) submarine may themselves accumulate a decompression obligation, which may exceed the bottom time limits of the Defense and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine (DCIEM) Air and In-Water Oxygen Decompression tables (DCIEM Table 1 and 2) presently used by the RAN. This study compared DCIEM Table 2 with alternative decompression tables with longer bottom times: United States Navy XVALSS_DISSUB 7, VVAL-18M and Royal Navy 14 Modified tables.
Methods: Estimated probability of decompression sickness (PDCS), the units pulmonary oxygen toxicity dose (UPTD), the volume of oxygen required and the total decompression time were calculated for hypothetical single and repetitive exposures to 253 kPa air pressure for various bottom times and prescribed decompression schedules.
Results: Compared to DCIEM Table 2, XVALSS_DISSUB 7 single and repetitive schedules had lower estimated PDCS, which came at the cost of longer oxygen decompressions. For single exposures, DCIEM schedules had PDCS estimates ranging from 1.8% to 6.4% with 0 to 101 UPTD and XVALSS_DISSUB 7 schedules had PDCS of less than 3.1%, with 36 to 350 UPTD.
Conclusions: The XVALSS_DISSUB 7 table was specifically designed for submarine rescue and, unlike DCIEM Table 2, has schedules for the estimated maximum required bottom times at 253 kPa. Adopting these tables may negate the requirement for saturation decompression of rescue personnel exceeding DCIEM limits.
Keywords: Decompression sickness; Decompression tables; Environmental medicine; Military diving; Models; Oxygen; Probability.