Background: Image guidance based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or ultrasound (US) is widely used to aid decision making in glioma surgery, but tumor delineation based on these 2 modalities does not always correspond.
Objective: To analyze volumes of diffuse low-grade gliomas (LGGs) based on preoperative 3-D FLAIR MRIs compared to intraoperative 3-D US image recordings to quantitatively assess potential discrepancies between the 2 imaging modalities.
Methods: Twenty-three patients with supratentorial WHO grade II gliomas undergoing primary surgery guided by neuronavigation based on preoperative FLAIR MRI and navigated 3-D US were included. Manual volume segmentation was performed twice in 3-D Slicer version 4.0.0 to assess intrarater variabilities and compare modalities with regard to tumor volume. Factors possibly related to correspondence between MRI and US were also explored.
Results: In 20 out of 23 patients (87%), the LGG tumor volume segmented from intraoperative US data was smaller than the tumor volume segmented from the preoperative 3-D FLAIR MRI. The median difference between MRI and US volumes was 7.4 mL (range: -4.9-58.7 mL, P < .001) with US LGG volumes corresponding to a median of 74% (range: 42%-183%) of the MRI LGG volumes. However, there was considerable intraobserver variability for US volumes. The correspondence between MRI and US data was higher for astrocytomas (92%).
Conclusion: The tumor volumes of LGGs segmented from intraoperative US images were most often smaller than the tumor volumes segmented from preoperative MRIs. There was a much better match between the 2 modalities in astrocytomas.