Background: Fifth metacarpal fractures are often treated nonoperatively with serial radiographs; however, the utility of these radiographs in altering clinical management has not been investigated. We hypothesize that follow-up plain films will not alter clinical management and are therefore unnecessary for most patients.
Methods: Between 2007 and 2014, patients with a fifth metacarpal fracture at our level I trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with inadequate documentation or imaging, ipsilateral upper extremity injuries, or who underwent initial surgical fixation were excluded. Initial and postreduction radiographs were reviewed by 4 board-certified attending hand surgeons and 2 hand fellows who indicated their preferred management. At a later date, blinded to their initial management, the reviewers assessed follow-up films taken at least 2 weeks later and indicated their preferred management.
Results: In total, 60 patients met inclusion criteria, and of those, 30 were randomly selected. There were 9 base, 7 shaft, and 14 neck fractures. Initially, reviewers opted for nonoperative management in 72.2% of base, 71.4% of shaft, and 91.7% of neck fractures. After reviewing follow-up films, reviewers changed from nonoperative to operative management in 0.0% of base, 9.5% of shaft, and 1.2% of neck fractures.
Conclusions: Follow-up radiographs may not be indicated for most fifth metacarpal base and neck fractures. Follow-up radiographs may change management in select fifth metacarpal shaft fractures as these fractures may displace. Follow-up radiographs should be performed at the discretion of the treating surgeon on an as-needed basis for fractures at risk for displacement.
Keywords: boxer’s fracture; metacarpal fracture; postoperative imaging.