Response to Comment on "Retinal pulse wave velocity measurement using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography"

J Biophotonics. 2018 Feb;11(2). doi: 10.1002/jbio.201700379. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

Abstract

Spahr et al. recently commented on our latest paper "Retinal pulse wave velocity measurement using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography" with a conclusion that the measured retinal pulse wave velocity (rPWV) in our paper was contradictory to theoretical predictions and previously published results. However, the theoretical predictions by Spahr et al. based on Moens-Korteweg equation are questionable, since the Moens-Korteweg equation should not be used for small arteries like retinal arteries. Previously, various measurements of rPWV using different technologies have been reported. The results on human and rats are not consistent. As the rPWV is an unknown value, we argue that the time delay derived between 2 arterial sites should be verified to see if the delay truly represents the pulse wave transit time. In the future, special emphasis should be placed on demonstration of the reproducibility of technologies and data analysis of large samples.

Keywords: optical coherence tomography; retinal pulse wave velocity.

Publication types

  • Comment

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Humans
  • Pulse Wave Analysis*
  • Rats
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retina
  • Retinal Artery*
  • Tomography, Optical Coherence