Deferred treatment is a safe and viable option for selected patients with mantle cell lymphoma

Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 Dec;59(12):2862-2870. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1455973. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

Abstract

Prospective identification of candidates for deferred therapy is not standardized and many patients receive immediate therapy regardless of risk. We conducted a retrospective, multi-center cohort analysis of MCL patients with comprehensive clinical data to examine the use and safety of deferred therapy for newly diagnosed patients. Previously untreated patients ≥18 years-old with MCL diagnosed in 1993-2015 at five academic sites were included. Of 395 patients, 72 (18%) received deferred therapy (defined as receipt of first treatment >90 days following initial diagnosis). Patients receiving deferred therapy were more likely to have an ECOG performance status of 0 (67 versus 44% p = .001), have no B symptoms (83 versus 65% p = .003) and have normal LDH levels at diagnosis (87 versus 55% p < .001). In multivariable analysis, deferred therapy was not associated with a significant difference in OS (HR 0.64: 95% CI 0.22-1.84, p = .407).

Keywords: Mantle cell lymphoma; deferred therapy; non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Disease Progression
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell / diagnosis
  • Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell / drug therapy*
  • Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell / mortality
  • Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell / pathology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Selection*
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Survival Analysis
  • Time-to-Treatment*
  • Watchful Waiting / methods*