Percutaneous Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018 Jul 26;20(9):79. doi: 10.1007/s11886-018-1023-6.

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review discusses the benefits of a completely percutaneous approach to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), and provides an outline as to how this is performed by a multidisciplinary team of cardiologists and cardiovascular surgeons at a quaternary care community hospital.

Recent findings: Percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (PEVAR) as compared to EVAR utilizing surgical femoral artery exposure is associated with a significant reduction in operation time, length of stay, access site complications, patient discomfort, and procedural cost. Furthermore, PEVAR may be the preferred approach in patients presenting with aneurysm rupture, as the avoidance of general anesthesia has been associated with improved 30-day mortality. Assuming no contraindication based on vascular anatomy, clinical status, or patient preference, these findings suggest that in properly selected patients, PEVAR should be the primary method for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in both stable and unstable patients.

Keywords: Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Endovascular repair; Percutaneous repair; Stent graft.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / mortality*
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / surgery*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / methods*
  • Endovascular Procedures / adverse effects
  • Endovascular Procedures / methods*
  • Femoral Artery / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Patient Selection
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control
  • Risk Factors
  • Stents
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome