An Analysis of Informed Consent Form Readability of Oncology Research Protocols

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Oct;13(4):363-367. doi: 10.1177/1556264618795057. Epub 2018 Aug 20.

Abstract

Twenty-two percent of adults in the United States have only basic health literacy skills. We used a multiple linear regression model to identify associations between readability of informed consent documents with study sponsor, study phase, and approval year using a sample of 143 oncology studies at Ochsner Medical Center. The M ± SD Flesh-Kincaid Reading Grade Level (RGL) was 10.33 ± 0.85 and Flesh Reading Ease (FRE) was 52.89 ± 5.49. National Cancer Institute studies had a significantly lower mean RGL and FRE as compared with other sponsors (RGL 9.85 ± 0.66 vs. 10.72 ± 0.79; p value < .0001). Mean RGL did not differ by study phase. Future research should include assessment and improvement of the readability of informed consent documents.

Keywords: consent forms; health literacy; oncology studies; protocols; readability.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Clinical Protocols
  • Comprehension*
  • Consent Forms*
  • Health Literacy*
  • Humans
  • Informed Consent*
  • Medical Oncology*
  • Reading*
  • Research
  • United States