Diagnostic value of emergency medical services provider judgement in the identification of head injuries among trauma patients

Eur J Neurol. 2019 Feb;26(2):274-280. doi: 10.1111/ene.13804. Epub 2018 Sep 30.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Previous studies have reported that many patients with a severe head injury are not transported to a higher-level trauma centre where the necessary round-the-clock neurosurgical care is available. The aim of this study was to analyse the diagnostic value of emergency medical services (EMS) provider judgement in the identification of a head injury.

Methods: In this multicentre cohort study, all trauma patients aged 16 years and over who were transported with highest priority to a trauma centre were evaluated. The diagnostic value of EMS provider judgement was determined using an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥1 in the head region as reference standard.

Results: A total of 980 (35.4%) of the 2766 patients who were included had a head injury. EMS provider judgement (Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥1) had a sensitivity of 67.9% and a specificity of 87.7%. In the cohort, 208 (7.5%) patients had a severe head injury. Of these, 68% were transported to a level I trauma centre.

Conclusions: Identification of a head injury on-scene is challenging. EMS providers could not identify 32% of the patients with a head injury and 21% of the patients with a severe head injury. Additional education, training and a supplementary protocol with predictors of a severe head injury could help EMS providers in the identification of these patients.

Keywords: head injury; neurotrauma; pre-hospital; trauma; triage.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cohort Studies
  • Craniocerebral Trauma / diagnosis*
  • Emergency Medical Services / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Judgment*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Trauma Centers
  • Triage*
  • Young Adult