Vibration testing: Optimizing methods to improve reliability

Muscle Nerve. 2019 Feb;59(2):229-235. doi: 10.1002/mus.26373. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

Abstract

Introduction: In this study we assessed the test-retest reliability of a Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork and an electronic vibrameter with hand-held and fixed probes.

Methods: Fifty healthy volunteers were assessed twice in the upper and lower limb 15 minutes apart. Reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM). The effect of stimulus parameters on vibration disappearance threshold (VDT) was assessed by analysis of variance.

Results: All 3 tools showed good reliability (ICCs = 0.65-0.95). Vibrameter recordings with the fixed probe showed high variability. The vibrameter was more sensitive in detecting body-site and age differences in vibration thresholds than the tuning fork. Significantly higher VDT was observed when higher starting amplitudes and slower rates of change were used.

Discussion: The hand-held vibrameter is a superior tool to monitor vibration sense. The stimulus amplitude and rate of change are important to control as they alter VDT. Muscle Nerve 59:229-235, 2019.

Keywords: healthy volunteers; reliability; sensory testing; tuning fork; vibrameter; vibration sense.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Healthy Volunteers
  • Humans
  • Lower Extremity / physiology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neural Conduction / physiology
  • Neurologic Examination
  • Perception / physiology*
  • Psychophysics / instrumentation
  • Psychophysics / methods
  • Reference Values
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensory Thresholds / physiology*
  • Vibration*
  • Young Adult