Waist circumference thresholds and cardiorespiratory fitness

J Sport Health Sci. 2019 Jan;8(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

Abstract

Purpose: This study's purpose was to examine whether established risk categories of waist circumference (WC)-normal, high risk, and very high health risk-reflected significant differences in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and physical activity (PA) level.

Methods: CRF was directly measured as maximal oxygen uptake during a progressive graded treadmill test to exhaustion in 722 individuals (349 women) aged 20-85 years. WC was measured between the lower rib and the iliac crest. Objectively measured PA was assessed using an accelerometer.

Results: Men in the normal risk group (WC < 94 cm) had a 31% higher CRF and 43% higher level of moderate-to-vigorous PA than men in the very high risk group (with a WC > 102 cm). Corresponding numbers for women within normal (WC < 80 cm) and very high risk group (WC > 88 cm) were 25% and 18% (p < 0.05). There was a high negative correlation between CRF and WC in men (r = -0.68), and a moderate correlation for women (r = -0.49; p < 0.001). For each cm increase in WC, CRF was reduced by 0.48 and 0.27 mL/kg/min in men and women, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The recommended WC thresholds for abdominal obesity reflected significant differences in CRF for both men and women, and could serve as a useful instrument for estimating health-related differences in CRF.

Keywords: Abdominal obesity; Fit fat; Maximal oxygen uptake; Obesity; Public health; Waist circumference.