Single-family room design in the neonatal intensive care unit did not improve growth

Acta Paediatr. 2019 Jun;108(6):1028-1035. doi: 10.1111/apa.14746. Epub 2019 Mar 13.

Abstract

Aim: The aim was to compare growth in very premature infants cared for in a single-family room (SFR) and an open-bay (OB) unit. We recorded duration of parental presence and skin-to-skin contact as proxies for parental involvement in care of their infants.

Methods: We consecutively included infants with gestational ages 28 + 0 through 32 + 0 weeks at two hospitals in Norway, one SFR unit (n = 35) and one OB unit (n = 42). Weight, length, and head circumference were followed from birth to four months after term date. Both units adhered to the same nutritional protocol and methods of recording events.

Results: The SFR mothers spent a mean (standard deviation) of 111 (38) hours and the OB mothers 33 (13) hours with their infants during the first week and 21 (5) versus 7 (3) hours per day later. The respective duration of skin-to-skin care was 21 (10) versus 12 (8) hours during the first week and 4.2 (2) versus 3.0 (2) hours per day later. The differences were similar, but less pronounced for the fathers. The growth trajectories did not differ between the groups.

Conclusion: SFR care was associated with more parental involvement, but not with better growth.

Keywords: Family-centred care; Growth; Single-family room; Skin-to-skin contact; Very premature infant.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant, Premature / growth & development*
  • Intensive Care Units, Neonatal*
  • Male
  • Patients' Rooms*