Therapeutic Interventions for Scapular Kinematics and Disability in Patients With Subacromial Impingement: A Systematic Review

J Athl Train. 2019 Mar;54(3):283-295. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-309-17. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

Abstract

Context: Impaired scapular kinematics are commonly reported in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). Various therapeutic interventions designed to improve scapular kinematics and minimize pain and disability have been described in the literature. However, the short- and long-term benefits of these interventions are unclear.

Objective: To determine the effects of specific short- and long-term therapeutic interventions on scapular kinematics and disability in patients with SIS.

Data sources: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases from their origins to January 2018 using a combination of the key words scapular kinematics AND (shoulder dysfunction OR subacromial impingement) and conducted a manual search by reviewing the references of the identified papers.

Study selection: Studies were included if (1) preintervention and postintervention measures were available; (2) patient-reported outcomes were reported; (3) scapular kinematics measures at 90° of ascending limb elevation in the scapular plane were included; (4) SIS was diagnosed in participants or participants self-reported symptoms of SIS; (5) they were original clinical studies published in English; and (6) the sample sizes, means, and measure of variability for each group were reported.

Data extraction: Seven studies were found. Sample sizes, means, and standard deviations of scapular upward rotation, posterior tilt, and internal rotation at 90° of ascending limb elevation on the scapular plane and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were extracted.

Data synthesis: Standardized mean differences between preintervention and postintervention measures with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. We observed that the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores improved (mean difference = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.54, 1.16) but did not observe changes in scapular upward rotation (mean difference = -0.04; 95% CI = -0.31, 0.22), posterior tilt (mean difference = -0.09; 95% CI = -0.32, 0.15), or internal rotation (mean difference = 0.06; 95% CI = -0.19, 0.31).

Conclusions: The short- and long-term therapeutic interventions for SIS improved patient-reported outcomes but not scapular kinematics. The identified improvements in shoulder pain and function were not likely explained by changes in scapular kinematics.

Keywords: 3-D motion analysis; patient-reported outcomes; scapular dysfunction; shoulder pathology.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Humans
  • Patient Care Management / methods*
  • Shoulder Impingement Syndrome* / physiopathology
  • Shoulder Impingement Syndrome* / therapy
  • Treatment Outcome