The NAME trial: a direct comparison of classical oral Navelbine versus Metronomic Navelbine in metastatic breast cancer

Future Oncol. 2019 Aug;15(22):2561-2569. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0124. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

Abstract

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is in general given in cycles of maximum tolerated doses to potentially maximize the therapeutic outcome. However, when compared with targeted therapies for MBC, conventional and dose intensified chemotherapy has caused only modest survival benefits during the recent decades, often compromising the quality of life considerably. Navelbine is an antineoplastic agent that has shown efficacy in the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including breast cancer. Early clinical trials involving both breast cancer and lung cancer patients suggest that metronomic dosing of Navelbine might be at least as effective as classical administration (once weekly, etc.). The NAME trial compares these two strategies of Navelbine administration in MBC patients.

Keywords: NAME; Navelbine; Phase II trial; breast cancer; chemotherapy; metronomic; vinorelbine.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase II
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Intravenous
  • Administration, Metronomic
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / administration & dosage*
  • Breast Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology
  • Drug Administration Routes
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Maximum Tolerated Dose
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Quality of Life
  • Vinblastine / administration & dosage*
  • Vinorelbine / administration & dosage*
  • Vinorelbine / adverse effects

Substances

  • Vinblastine
  • Vinorelbine