Fitness costs of delayed pollination in a mixed-mating plant

Ann Bot. 2019 Nov 15;124(5):869-881. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz141.

Abstract

Background and aims: To predict the evolutionary consequences of pollinator declines, we need to understand the evolution of delayed autonomous self-pollination, which is expected to evolve as a mechanism of reproductive assurance when cross-pollination becomes unreliable. This involves estimating the costs of increased levels of selfing as well as those associated with floral senescence.

Methods: We studied the mechanisms and costs of delayed self-pollination in the mixed-mating vine Dalechampia scandens (Euphorbiaceae) by first assessing among-population variation in herkogamy and dichogamy, which together determine the rate and timing of autonomous self-pollination. We then tested whether floral longevity responds plastically to delayed pollination. Finally, we assessed the costs of delayed self-pollination in terms of seed number and size, explicitly separating inbreeding depression from effects of floral senescence.

Key results: Herkogamy varied extensively, while variation in dichogamy was more limited. Unpollinated blossoms increased their longevity, but seed quantity and quality decreased with increasing delays in pollination, independently of inbreeding depression.

Conclusions: In D. scandens, earlier autonomous selfing is facilitated by reduced herkogamy rather than reduced protogyny, providing reproductive assurance while maintaining the possibility for outcrossing events. Effective early autonomous self-pollination may evolve under reduced cross-pollination reliability in response to costs associated with floral senescence.

Keywords: Dalechampia scandens; delayed self-pollination; dichogamy; floral ontogeny; flower longevity; herkogamy; inbreeding depression; mating system; plant fitness; pollination reliability; pollinator decline.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Flowers
  • Inbreeding Depression*
  • Pollination*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Reproduction