Peer support for frequent users of inpatient mental health care in Uganda: protocol of a quasi-experimental study

BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 29;19(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2360-8.

Abstract

Background: Reducing readmissions among frequent users of psychiatric inpatient care could result in substantial cost savings to under-resourced mental health systems. Studies from high-income countries indicate that formal peer support can be an effective intervention for the reduction of readmissions among frequent users. Although in recent years formal peer support programmes have been established in mental health services in a few low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), they have not been rigorously evaluated.

Methods: This protocol describes a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study conducted as part of a broader evaluation of the Brain Gain II peer support programme based at Butabika National Referral Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. The primary objective is to investigate whether frequent users of psychiatric inpatient care who have access to a peer support worker (PSW+) experience a greater reduction in rehospitalisation rates and number of days spent in hospital compared to those who do not have access to a peer support worker (PSW-). Frequent users, defined as adults diagnosed with either a mental disorder or epilepsy who have had three or more inpatient stays at Butabika over the previous 24 months, are referred to Brain Gain II by hospital staff on five inpatient wards. Frequent users who normally reside in a district where peer support workers currently operate (Kampala, Jinja, Wakiso and Mukono) are eligible for formal peer support and enter the PSW+ group. Participants in the PSW+ group are expected to receive at least one inpatient visit by a trained peer support worker before hospital discharge and three to six additional visits after discharge. Frequent users from other districts enter the PSW- group and receive standard care. Participants' admissions data are extracted from hospital records at point of referral and six months following referral.

Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first quasi-experimental study of formal peer support in a LMIC and the first to assess change in readmissions, an outcome of particular relevance to policy-makers seeking cost-effective alternatives to institutionalised mental health care.

Keywords: Community mental health; Global mental health; Peer support; Service user involvement.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial Protocol
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Counseling
  • Female
  • Hospitalization* / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mental Disorders* / psychology
  • Mental Disorders* / therapy
  • Mental Health
  • Mental Health Recovery
  • Mental Health Services*
  • Patient Discharge
  • Patient Readmission* / statistics & numerical data
  • Peer Group*
  • Problem Solving
  • Uganda