Endovascular Versus Surgical Revascularization for Acute Limb Ischemia: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan;13(1):e008150. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008150. Epub 2020 Jan 17.

Abstract

Background: The optimal revascularization strategy for acute limb ischemia (ALI) remains unclear, and contemporary comparative effectiveness data on endovascular versus surgical revascularization are lacking.

Methods: We used the 2010 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample databases to identify hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of ALI. Patients were propensity-score matched on the likelihood of undergoing endovascular versus surgical revascularization using a logistic regression model. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, stroke, composite of death/myocardial infarction/stroke, any amputation, fasciotomy, acute kidney injury, major bleeding, transfusion, vascular complications, length of stay, and hospital costs.

Results: Of 10 484 (weighted national estimate=51 914) hospitalizations for ALI, endovascular revascularization was performed in 5008 (47.8%) and surgical revascularization in 5476 (52.2%). In the propensity-score matched cohort (n=7746; 3873 per group), patients who underwent endovascular revascularization had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (2.8% versus 4.0%; P=0.002), myocardial infarction (1.9% versus 2.7%; P=0.022), composite of death/myocardial infarction/stroke (5.2% versus 7.5%; P<0.001), acute kidney injury (10.5% versus 11.9%; P=0.043), fasciotomy (1.9% versus 8.9%; P<0.001), major bleeding (16.7% versus 21.0%; P<0.001), and transfusion (10.3% versus 18.5%; P<0.001), but higher vascular complications (1.4% versus 0.7%; P=0.002), compared with those undergoing surgical revascularization. Rates of any amputation were similar between the 2 groups (4.7% versus 5.1%; P=0.43). Median length of stay was shorter and hospital costs higher with endovascular versus surgical revascularization.

Conclusions: In patients with ALI, endovascular revascularization was associated with better in-hospital clinical outcomes compared with surgical revascularization. Contemporary randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for ALI.

Keywords: amputation; angioplasty; in-hospital mortality; peripheral artery disease; surgery.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Databases, Factual
  • Endovascular Procedures* / adverse effects
  • Endovascular Procedures* / economics
  • Endovascular Procedures* / mortality
  • Female
  • Hospital Costs
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Humans
  • Inpatients
  • Ischemia / diagnosis
  • Ischemia / economics
  • Ischemia / mortality
  • Ischemia / therapy*
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease / diagnosis
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease / economics
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease / mortality
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease / therapy*
  • Postoperative Complications / mortality
  • Postoperative Complications / surgery
  • Propensity Score
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States
  • Vascular Grafting* / adverse effects
  • Vascular Grafting* / economics
  • Vascular Grafting* / mortality