Small eyes in dim light: Implications to spatio-temporal visual abilities in Drosophila melanogaster

Vision Res. 2020 Apr:169:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

Abstract

Fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, are active over a range of light intensities in the wild, but lab-reared flies are often tested only in bright light. Similarly, scarce feeding during larval stages-common in nature-generates smaller adults, and a wide range of eye sizes not found in well-fed lab colonies. Both dimmer light and smaller eyes limit light capture and have undetermined effects on visual behaviors such as flight. In this study, we used moving sinusoidal gratings to test spatial acuity, temporal acuity, and contrast threshold of female flies of varying eye sizes at different light intensities. We also investigated vision in the smaller and often neglected male fruit flies. As light intensity drops from 50.1 lx to 0.3 lx, flies have a reduced spatial acuity (females: from 0.1 to 0.06 cycles per degree, CPD, males: 0.1 to 0.04 CPD) and temporal acuity (females: from 50 Hz to 10 Hz, males: 25 Hz to 10 Hz), and an increased contrast detection threshold (females: from 10% to 29%, males: 19% to 48%). We find no major sex-specific differences after accounting for eye size. Visual abilities in both small (eye area of 0.1-0.17 mm2) and large flies (0.17-0.23 mm2) suffer at 0.3 lx compared to 50.1 lx, but small flies suffer more (spatial acuity: 0.03 vs 0.06 CPD, contrast threshold: 76% vs 57%, temporal acuity: 5 Hz vs 10 Hz). Our results suggest visual abilities of small flies suffer more than large flies at low light levels, possibly leading to size- and light intensity-dependent effects on foraging, navigation, and flight.

Keywords: Low light intensity; Miniaturization; Optomotor response; Sensitivity; Tuning curve; Wide-field motion.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Drosophila melanogaster
  • Female
  • Male
  • Sex Factors
  • Visual Perception*