The effect of surgical regenerative treatment for peri-implantitis: A systematic review

Marwan Aljohani; Sin L Yong; Abdullah Bin Rahmah

doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.10.006

The effect of surgical regenerative treatment for peri-implantitis: A systematic review

Saudi Dent J. 2020 Mar;32(3):109-119. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

Authors

Marwan Aljohani^{1

2}, Sin L Yong², Abdullah Bin Rahmah^{2

3}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Madina, Saudi Arabia.
² Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Dentistry, the University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
³ Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, King Saud University, College of Dentistry, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to systematically review literature on the effectiveness of surgical regenerative treatment for peri-implantitis.

Methods: Different databases were searched including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE and MEDLINE. Primary outcomes were changes in probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), radiographic marginal bone level (RBL) and signs of infection. Secondary outcomes were facial marginal recession, aesthetic outcomes and cost of treatment. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a minimum of 12 months follow-up period after regenerative surgical treatment were selected according to PRISMA guidelines.

Main results: Five studies were selected. The highest mean reduction of PPD was 3.1 mm in a bovine-derived xenograft (BDX) group. The highest percentage reduction of BOP occurred in patients treated with implantoplasty and saline (a reduction of 85.2%). The highest mean defect fill of RBL was reported in the porous titanium granules group (3.6 mm). Mean reductions of PPD, RBL and facial marginal soft tissue recession were statistically insignificant (p-value > 0.05) in the studies included. However, the mean reduction in BOP was statistically significant (p-value < 0.05) in four studies as compared to the baseline (before treatment). A high heterogeneity among the studies included, regarding surgical protocols, defects morphology and selection of biomaterials, was found.

Conclusion: All studies included showed an improvement in clinical conditions after surgical regenerative treatment for peri-implantitis. However, no study has shown any statistical significance in its approach. There is a lack of scientific evidence in literature regarding which type of bone substitute has superiority in the treatment of peri-implantitis, as well as the role of barrier membranes, methods for detoxification of implant surfaces and antimicrobial prescriptions. For these reasons further well-designed RCTs are recommended.

Keywords: Alveolar bone grafting; Alveolar bone loss; Bone regeneration; Peri-implant diseases; Peri-implantitis.

Publication types

Review