Results of a randomized, double-blind phase II clinical trial of NY-ESO-1 vaccine with ISCOMATRIX adjuvant versus ISCOMATRIX alone in participants with high-risk resected melanoma

J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Apr;8(1):e000410. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000410.

Abstract

Background: To compare the clinical efficacy of New York Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1) vaccine with ISCOMATRIX adjuvant versus ISCOMATRIX alone in a randomized, double-blind phase II study in participants with fully resected melanoma at high risk of recurrence.

Methods: Participants with resected stage IIc, IIIb, IIIc and IV melanoma expressing NY-ESO-1 were randomized to treatment with three doses of NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIX or ISCOMATRIX adjuvant administered intramuscularly at 4-week intervals, followed by a further dose at 6 months. Primary endpoint was the proportion free of relapse at 18 months in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and two per-protocol populations. Secondary endpoints included relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), safety and NY-ESO-1 immunity.

Results: The ITT population comprised 110 participants, with 56 randomized to NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIX and 54 to ISCOMATRIX alone. No significant toxicities were observed. There were no differences between the study arms in relapses at 18 months or for median time to relapse; 139 vs 176 days (p=0.296), or relapse rate, 27 (48.2%) vs 26 (48.1%) (HR 0.913; 95% CI 0.402 to 2.231), respectively. RFS and OS were similar between the study arms. Vaccine recipients developed strong positive antibody responses to NY-ESO-1 (p≤0.0001) and NY-ESO-1-specific CD4+ and CD8+ responses. Biopsies following relapse did not demonstrate differences in NY-ESO-1 expression between the study populations although an exploratory study demonstrated reduced (NY-ESO-1)+/Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) class I+ double-positive cells in biopsies from vaccine recipients performed on relapse in 19 participants.

Conclusions: The vaccine was well tolerated, however, despite inducing antigen-specific immunity, it did not affect survival endpoints. Immune escape through the downregulation of NY-ESO-1 and/or HLA class I molecules on tumor may have contributed to relapse.

Keywords: HLA; immunology; oncology; randomised trials; tumours.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase II
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adjuvants, Immunologic / administration & dosage*
  • Adjuvants, Immunologic / adverse effects
  • Antigens, Neoplasm / genetics
  • Antigens, Neoplasm / immunology
  • Biopsy
  • Cancer Vaccines / administration & dosage*
  • Cancer Vaccines / adverse effects
  • Cancer Vaccines / genetics
  • Cancer Vaccines / immunology
  • Chemotherapy, Adjuvant / adverse effects
  • Chemotherapy, Adjuvant / methods
  • Cholesterol / administration & dosage*
  • Cholesterol / adverse effects
  • Dermatologic Surgical Procedures
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Combinations
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Immunogenicity, Vaccine
  • Male
  • Melanoma / diagnosis
  • Melanoma / immunology
  • Melanoma / mortality
  • Melanoma / therapy*
  • Membrane Proteins / genetics
  • Membrane Proteins / immunology
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / diagnosis
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / epidemiology*
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / prevention & control
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Phospholipids / administration & dosage*
  • Phospholipids / adverse effects
  • Saponins / administration & dosage*
  • Saponins / adverse effects
  • Skin / pathology
  • Skin Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Skin Neoplasms / immunology
  • Skin Neoplasms / mortality
  • Skin Neoplasms / therapy*

Substances

  • Adjuvants, Immunologic
  • Antigens, Neoplasm
  • CTAG1B protein, human
  • Cancer Vaccines
  • Drug Combinations
  • ISCOMATRIX
  • Membrane Proteins
  • Phospholipids
  • Saponins
  • Cholesterol