Topical hemostatic and tissue-sealing agents in gynecologic surgery

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;32(4):285-291. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000632.

Abstract

Purpose of review: To review current topical hemostatic agent use and how it pertains to gynecologic surgery.

Recent findings: Recent literature suggests some benefit of topical hemostatic agents (THA). THAs confer reduced bleeding and shorter operating room time in women undergoing hysterectomy for cancer and in abdominal myomectomy. THA use in women undergoing ovarian cystectomy is associated with a decreased reduction in ovarian reserve. Potential complications of THA use include abscess formation, small bowel obstruction, inflammation, allergic reaction, and transmission of blood-borne pathogens. Evidence for use of THA in benign minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) procedures is lacking.

Summary: Although evidence exists for the efficacy of THA in reducing blood loss and operating times across surgical subspecialties, specific, appropriate, and efficacious use of THAs in gynecologic surgery remains ill-defined. Knowledge of their mechanisms of action and potential complications should enable surgeons to optimize desired effects and minimize harm.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Topical
  • Blood Loss, Surgical / prevention & control*
  • Female
  • Hemostasis / drug effects
  • Hemostatics / administration & dosage*
  • Hemostatics / adverse effects
  • Hemostatics / pharmacology
  • Humans
  • Hysterectomy / adverse effects*
  • Hysterectomy / methods
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / adverse effects
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Uterine Myomectomy / adverse effects*
  • Uterine Myomectomy / methods

Substances

  • Hemostatics