Uterine bleeding with hormone therapies in menopausal women: a systematic review

Climacteric. 2020 Dec;23(6):550-558. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2020.1806816. Epub 2020 Sep 7.

Abstract

Uterine bleeding is a common reason why women discontinue menopausal hormone therapy (HT). This systematic review compared bleeding profiles reported in studies for continuous-combined HT approved in North America and Europe for moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women with a uterus. Non-head-to-head studies showed that uterine bleeding varies by formulation and administration route, with oral having a better bleeding profile than transdermal formulations. Cumulative amenorrhea over a year ranged from 18 to 61% with oral HT and from 9 to 27% with transdermal HT, as reported for continuous-combined HT containing 17β-estradiol (E2)/progesterone (P4) (56%), E2/norethisterone acetate (NETA) (49%), E2/drospirenone (45%), conjugated equine estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate (18-54%), ethinyl estradiol/NETA (31-61%), E2/levonorgestrel patch (16%), and E2/NETA patch (9-27%). Amenorrhea rates and the mean number of bleeding/spotting days improved over time. The oral E2/P4 combination was amongst those with lower bleeding rates and may be an appropriate alternative for millions of women seeking bioidentical HT and/or those who have bleeding concerns with other HT.

Keywords: Amenorrhea; bioidentical; bleeding; continuous-combined hormone therapy; hormone therapy; menopause; uterine bleeding; vasomotor symptoms.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Cutaneous
  • Administration, Oral
  • Estrogen Replacement Therapy / adverse effects*
  • Estrogen Replacement Therapy / methods
  • Estrogens / administration & dosage
  • Estrogens / adverse effects*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Menopause / drug effects*
  • Middle Aged
  • Progesterone / administration & dosage
  • Progesterone / adverse effects*
  • Uterine Hemorrhage / chemically induced*

Substances

  • Estrogens
  • Progesterone