Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios Versus Fractional Flow Reserve: What to Do With Discordant Results?

Timir K Paul; Arnold H Seto; Christopher J White

doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.018344

Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios Versus Fractional Flow Reserve: What to Do With Discordant Results?

J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep 15;9(18):e018344. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018344. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

Authors

Timir K Paul¹, Arnold H Seto², Christopher J White³

Affiliations

¹ Division of Cardiovascular Medicine East Tennessee State University Johnson City TN.
² University of California Irvine Irvine CA.
³ Department of Cardiovascular Diseases The Ochsner Clinical School University of Queensland, AU and the John Ochsner Heart & Vascular Institute Ochsner Medical Center New Orleans LA.

No abstract available

Keywords: Editorials; fractional flow reserve; instantaneous wave‐free ratio; nonhyperemic diastolic pressure ratio; percutaneous coronary intervention.

Publication types

Editorial
Comment

MeSH terms

Blood Pressure
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Stenosis*
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial*
Hemodynamics
Humans