Corneal cross-linking versus conventional management for keratoconus: a lifetime economic model

J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):410-420. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1851556.

Abstract

Aims: To assess the cost-effectiveness of corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) versus no CXL for keratoconus in the United States (US).

Methods: A discrete-event microsimulation was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of corneal cross-linking (CXL, Photrexa + KXL combination product) versus no CXL for patients with keratoconus. The lifetime model was conducted from a US payor perspective. The source for CXL efficacy and safety data was a 12-month randomized, open-label, sham-controlled, multi-center, pivotal trial comparing CXL versus no CXL. Other inputs were sourced from the literature. The primary outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained. Costs (2019 USD) and effects were discounted 3% annually. The impacts of underlying uncertainty were evaluated by scenario, univariate, and probabilistic analyses.

Results: Starting at a mean baseline age of 31 years and considering a mixed population consisting of 80% slow-progressors and 20% fast-progressors, the CXL group was 25.9% less likely to undergo penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and spent 27.9 fewer years in advanced disease stages. CXL was dominant with lower total direct medical costs (-$8,677; $30,994 versus $39,671) and more QALYs (1.88; 21.80 versus 19.93) compared to no CXL. Considering the impact of reduced productivity loss in an exploratory scenario, CXL was associated with a lifetime cost-savings of $43,759 per patient. CXL was cost-effective within 2 years and cost-saving within 4.5 years.

Limitations: Limitations include those that are common to similar pharmacoeconomic models that rely on disparate sources for inputs and extrapolation on short-term outcomes to a long-term analytical horizon.

Conclusions: Keratoconus is a progressive and life-altering disease with substantial clinical, economic, and humanistic consequences. The economic value of cross-linking is maximized when applied earlier in the disease process and/or younger age, and extends to improved work productivity, out-of-pocket costs, and quality of life.

Keywords: Cross-linking; H51; I19; United States; corneal ectasia; cost-effectiveness; cost–benefit analysis; keratoconus; keratoplasty; myopia; quality of life; quality-adjusted life years.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Collagen / therapeutic use
  • Cross-Linking Reagents / therapeutic use
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Keratoconus* / drug therapy
  • Models, Economic
  • Photochemotherapy*
  • Photosensitizing Agents / therapeutic use
  • Quality of Life
  • Riboflavin / therapeutic use
  • Ultraviolet Rays

Substances

  • Cross-Linking Reagents
  • Photosensitizing Agents
  • Collagen
  • Riboflavin