Comparing three screen-based sedentary behaviours' effect upon adolescents' participation in physical activity: The ESSENS study

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0241887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241887. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Background: Literature focusing on the association between sedentary behaviours and physical activity has provided equivocal results and has been dominated by TV viewing as the indicator of sedentary behaviour. There is a need for more studies exploring the association between contemporary screen activities and physical activity among youth.

Methods: A cross-sectional study including 742 adolescents was conducted in 2016. Data were collected at school through an online questionnaire. Regression analyses were used to explore the association between different screen-based sedentary behaviours and participation in physical activity.

Results: The results showed that those with lower (vs higher) time spent on TV/movie streaming and electronic game playing both on weekdays and weekend days had significantly higher odds of participating in physical activity. There were no significant associations between socializing/surfing online both on weekdays and weekend days and physical activity in adjusted models.

Conclusions: TV/movie streaming and electronic game playing during both weekdays and weekend days were significantly inversely related with participating in physical activity. Initiatives aimed at reducing screen-based sedentary activities might result in favourable effects on physical activity levels among adolescents.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Exercise / physiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Norway
  • Regression Analysis
  • Sedentary Behavior*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Television
  • Time Factors
  • Video Games

Associated data

  • Dryad/10.5061/dryad.dbrv15f0c

Grants and funding

The ESSENS study received internal funding from the Oslo Metropolitan University. MKG is supported by funding from the Research Council of Norway (273823/H10). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.