Purpose: This study evaluates clinical and laboratory parameters, as well as extravasation and hematoma size on CTA as potential predictors of conventional angiogram (CA) results.
Methods: This is a retrospective study of 380 adult patients presenting with pelvic trauma over a 9-year period. Of these patients, 91 were found to have active arterial extravasation on initial CTA. Statistical analysis between the two groups +CA versus -CA was performed to determine whether clinical and laboratory parameters, as well as extravasation size and hematoma size could predict CA results.
Results: There were no significant differences in all clinical and laboratory data, including hemodynamic instability (defined as systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg) on presentation (22.2% vs. 21.4%), except for Glasgow Coma Scale (p = 0.015) when comparing the two groups. Extravasation size and hematoma size as continuous or categorical variables were not predictive of subsequent positive CA. Secondary analysis demonstrated no association between select parameters (i.e., hematocrit, systolic blood pressure, and lactate) and subsequent positive CA while controlling for extravasation size or hematoma size.
Conclusion: Clinical and laboratory parameters in blunt pelvic trauma with arterial hemorrhage were not significantly associated with subsequent conventional angiography results, once accounting for degree of hemorrhage. The area of the foci of active extravasation and hematoma size in the axial plane were not significantly associated with the need for embolization. We conclude from these findings that catheter angiography should be considered in patients with blunt pelvic trauma found to have active arterial extravasation, regardless of size of bleed or the patient's clinical or laboratory values.
Keywords: Angiography; Blood pressure; Extravasation size; Hematocrit; Hematoma size; Lactate; Pelvic trauma.