Aim: Accurate and precise estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential in kidney disease. We evaluated the usefulness of the mean of creatinine clearance (CCr ) and urea clearance (CUN ) examined over a 1-h urine collection period (1-h (CCr + CUN )/2) in a retrospective, cross-sectional study across two centres, as a relatively simple method for estimating GFR in children.
Methods: Children aged ≤18 years who underwent inulin clearance (CIn ) tests were eligible. Two clearance values were obtained during a 2-h test consisting of two periods of 1 h each. The mean clearance in two periods was defined as 1-h clearance. 1-h (CCr + CUN )/2, 1-h CCr , 1-h CUN and GFR estimated by Cr-based and cystatin C (CysC)-based formulas for Japanese children were compared with CIn . Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate correlations. The primary outcome measure was the correlation between 1-h (CCr + CUN )/2 and CIn .
Results: Fifty-three children were analysed. Their median age was 10.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 5.3-14.2) years, and median CIn and 1-h (CCr + CUN )/2 were 77.0 (IQR: 51.5-95.1) and 81.0 (IQR: 64.1-97.7) ml/min/1.73 m2 , respectively. Percentage difference of CIn and 1-h (CCr + CUN )/2 in the Bland-Altman plot was -11.2% (95% confidence interval - 15.3% - -7.1%), with 95% lower and upper limits of agreement of -40.3% and 18.0%, respectively. Thus, 1-h (CCr + CUN )/2 was 1.12 times CIn .
Conclusion: 1 h (CCr + CUN )/2 was almost concordant with CIn . 1-h (CCr + CUN )/2 can estimate GFR accurately and precisely, making it a simple and speedy test for use in clinical practice.
Keywords: clearance method; estimated glomerular filtration rate; estimating glomerular filtration rate; inulin clearance; kidney function test.
© 2021 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.