Is minimally invasive surgery for clinical stage I uterine carcinosarcoma safe?

J Robot Surg. 2022 Aug;16(4):943-949. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01323-3. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been a mainstay of the surgical management of uterine cancer since the mid-2000s. We aim to determine the role and safety of MIS in women with uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). An Institutional Review Board-approved study identified all patients with UCS between January 2011 and December 2017 at our institution. Demographic and outcome measures were abstracted from the medical records and tumor registry. Cox proportional hazard models, log rank tests, and comparisons of means were used to calculate significance (p < 0.05). 129 women with UCS were identified during the study period. 62 cases (48%) were open procedures and 67 cases (52%) were MIS with the majority of the MIS group having robotic surgery. 55% of the patients had pathological stage 1 disease. Thirty-eight percent of UCS tumors were heterologous. 93% of patients received adjuvant therapy in the form of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. There was no difference in the recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) between the open surgery and the MIS groups as well as between the heterologous and homologous UCS groups (p > 0.05). UCS represents a rare and aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer. Our data suggest that MIS is a safe surgical approach for staging in women with UCS.

Keywords: High-grade uterine cancer; Laparotomy; Minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery; Survival; Uterine carcinosarcoma.

MeSH terms

  • Carcinosarcoma* / pathology
  • Carcinosarcoma* / surgery
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hysterectomy
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures* / methods
  • Uterine Neoplasms* / drug therapy