Morphological, developmental, ultrastructural, and gene order characters are catalogued for the same set of arthropod terminals as we have scored in a recent study of histone H3 and U2 snRNA sequences (D. J. Colgan et al., 1998, Aust. J. Zool. 46, 419-437). We examine the implications of separate and simultaneous analyses of sequence and non-sequence data for arthropod relationships. The most parsimonious trees based on 211 non-sequence characters (273 apomorphic states) support traditional higher taxa as clades, including Mandibulata, Crustacea, Atelocerata, Myriapoda, and Hexapoda. Combined analysis of morphology with histone H3 and U2 sequences with equal character weights differs from the morphological results alone in supporting Progoneata + Hexapoda (= Labiophora) in favor of a monophyletic Myriapoda, resolves the entognathous hexapods as a grade, and supports pycnogonids as sister group to Euchelicerata (rather than as basal euarthropods). Monophyly of Chelicerata (including pycnogonids), Mandibulata, Crustacea, Progoneata, Chilopoda, and Hexapoda is maintained under a range of transition/transversion and third codon weights, whereas Atelocerata and Myriapoda/Labiophora do not withstand all sensitivity analyses.