Validation of Sonographic Fronto-Occipital Ratio Based on Anatomical Landmarks Compared to MR/CT-Derived Indexes in Children with Chiari II and Ventriculomegaly

Pediatr Neurosurg. 2022;57(2):71-77. doi: 10.1159/000521622. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound (US)-based indexes such as fronto-occipital ratio (FOR) can be used to obtain an acceptable estimation of ventricular volume. Patients with colpocephaly present a unique challenge due to the shape of their ventricles. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of the modified US-FOR index in children with Chiari II-related ventriculomegaly.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated Chiari II patients younger than 1 year who underwent head US and MR or CT scans for ventriculomegaly evaluation. MR/CT-based FOR was measured in the axial plane by identifying the widest diameter of frontal horns, occipital horns, and the interparietal diameter (IPD). US-based FOR (US-FOR) was measured using the largest diameter based on the following landmarks: frontal horn and IPD in the coronal plane at the level of the foramen of Monro, IPD just superior to the Sylvian fissures, and occipital horn posterior to the thalami and inferior to the superior margins of the thalami. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate inter-rater reliability, and Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were applied to assess agreement between US and other two modalities.

Results: Sixty-three paired US and MR/CT exams were assessed for agreement between US-FOR and MR/CT-FOR measurements. ICC showed an excellent inter-rater reliability for US-FOR (ICC = 0.99, p < 0.001) and MR/CT-FOR (ICC = 0.99, p < 0.001) measurements. The mean (range) values based on US-FOR showed a slight overestimation in comparison with MR/CT-FOR (0.51 [0.36-0.68] vs. 0.46 [0.34-0.64]). The Pearson correlation coefficient showed high cross-modality agreement for the FOR index (r = 0.83, p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed excellent concordance between US-FOR and MR/CT-FOR with a bias of 0.05 (95% CI: -0.03 to 0.13).

Conclusion: US-FOR in the coronal plane is a comparable tool for evaluating ventriculomegaly in Chiari II patients when compared with MR/CT-FOR, even in the context of colpocephaly.

Keywords: Chiari II malformation; Frontal occipital ratio; Landmark; Ultrasound; Ventriculomegaly.

MeSH terms

  • Brain Diseases
  • Child
  • Humans
  • Hydrocephalus* / diagnostic imaging
  • Lateral Ventricles / abnormalities
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Supplementary concepts

  • Colpocephaly