Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common post-operative complication, especially in trauma laparotomies. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) is a novel technique in reducing SSIs. We aim to study the rate of wound complications in trauma laparotomy with standard primary closure with staples vs iNPWT.
Methods: We had 152 patients meeting inclusion criteria who underwent emergent trauma laparotomies performed at Sentara Norfolk General from 2017 to 2020. We had 79 patients in the standard staple group and 73 patients in the iNWPT group. We then analyzed surgical site infection rates and wound complication rates in both groups within a 30-day period.
Results: The wound infection rate in the staple vs staple plus iNPWT was 10.0% vs 3.8%, respectively (P = .13). Wound dehiscence rates were 24.1% vs 10.13%, respectively (P = .02). When looking at a subset of patients with hollow viscous injury, the rate of SSIs was statistically lower in the iNPWT group. Prior to the introduction of the incisional vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) to our practice compared to after its introduction, 39.25% of wounds were left open vs 19.51%, respectively (P = .001).
Conclusion: Our data identified a trend toward a decrease in overall SSIs in trauma laparotomies closed with iNPWT. The use of iNPWT demonstrated a decrease in superficial wound dehiscence and a decrease in SSIs in patients with associated full thickness bowel injury. With iNPWT, we are more aggressive with primarily closing trauma laparotomy wounds. This shows promise for increasing primary closure rates while simultaneously decreasing overall superficial surgical site infection rate.