Neurorrhaphy, nerve grafting, and neurotization: a functional comparison of nerve reconstruction techniques

J Hand Surg Am. 1987 May;12(3):354-60. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(87)80003-5.

Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of three methods of peripheral nerve reconstruction: neurorrhaphy, nerve grafting, and neurotization. The extensor digitorum longus (EDL) neuromuscular unit of 63 New Zealand rabbits was used as the experimental model. Neuromuscular function was examined after 2, 4, and 6-month recovery periods. Variable recovery was seen after 2 months of recovery. At 6 months postoperatively, nerve grafting and neurorrhaphy were not statistically different from the unoperated control neuromuscular units. Neurotization grafting demonstrated a recovery of function of no greater than 50% at 6 months.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Electric Stimulation
  • Methods
  • Muscles / physiology
  • Peripheral Nerves / surgery*
  • Peroneal Nerve / physiology
  • Peroneal Nerve / transplantation
  • Rabbits