Background: This study sought to determine the accuracy in placing the acetabular component, estimation of leg length, offset, radiation time and dose, and operative time using a handheld navigation device compared to conventional anterior total hip arthroplasty (THA). It also examined the learning curve of the handheld navigation device.
Methods: Data were prospectively collected for a consecutive series of 159 THAs; 99 THAs with handheld navigation and 60 conventional THAs. Thresholds of <5°, ≥5° to <10°, and ≥10° for acetabular inclination and version and thresholds of <5 mm, ≥5 mm to <10 mm, and ≥10 mm for leg-length and combined offset discrepancy were used to assess accuracy. Fluoroscopy time and exposure, operative time, and complications were compared. Learning curve was determined using operative time. Statistical analysis was performed for the different accuracy thresholds with P values set a <0.05 for significance.
Results: The handheld navigation device demonstrated a mean accuracy of 3.2° and 1.8° for version and inclination, respectively. The handheld navigation group had significantly fewer outliers in version (P < .001), inclination (P < .001), leg-length discrepancy (P < .001), and offset discrepancy (P < .001). Fluoroscopic dose and time (P < .001) were lower in the handheld navigation cohort. The learning curve for handheld navigation was 31-35 cases. The mean operative time after the learning curve was similar to that in the conventional fluoroscopy group (P = .113).
Conclusions: Handheld navigation technology provided more accurate results while mitigating radiation exposure to the surgeon and patient. There were fewer outliers in the handheld navigation group. After the learning curve, all metrics improved in accuracy, and operative time was similar to that of the conventional technique.
Keywords: Anterior approach; Handheld navigation; Radiation exposure; Total hip arthroplasty.
© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons.