'Don't freak out if you get a letter saying cancer patient pathways!': Communication work between different demands in cancer care

Health (London). 2024 Mar;28(2):313-330. doi: 10.1177/13634593221127819. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

Abstract

This article explores healthcare professionals' experiences of their work with patient communication in standardised cancer patient pathways (CPPs). The theoretical and methodological framework for this study is institutional ethnography. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 72 healthcare professionals, including general practitioners, specialist physicians and other hospital staff, in five Norwegian hospitals. The study reveals four aspects of communication work that illuminate how the CPP policy mediates the way healthcare professionals interact with patients through communicating continuity, communicating (by dodging) the dreaded C-word, communicating patient participation, and communicating the relevance of time. Healthcare professionals' balancing of their different experiential realities run as a common thread through the four aspects of communication work identified in this study. The CPP policy, with its explicit focus on transparency, speed, and time frames creates challenges in an already delicate situation.

Keywords: cancer; communication work; institutional ethnography; patient-centred care; standardised cancer pathways.

MeSH terms

  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Communication
  • General Practitioners*
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Neoplasms*
  • Qualitative Research