[Clinical analysis of inflatable video-assisted mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy combined with laparoscopy]

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jan 1;61(1):48-53. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20220612-00265.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To examine the safety and effectiveness of inflatable video-assisted mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (IVMTE). Methods: Totally 269 patients admitted to the Anhui Provincial Hospital of Anhui Medical University who underwent IVMTE (IVMTE group, n=47) or thoracoscopy combined with minimally invasive Mckeown esophageal cancer resection (MIME group, n=222) from September 2017 to December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 31 males and 16 females in IVMTE group, aged (68.6±7.5) years (range: 54 to 87 years). There were 159 males and 63 females in MIME group, aged (66.8±8.8) years (range: 42 to 93 years). A 1∶1 match was performed on both groups by propensity score matching, with 38 cases in each group. The intraoperative conditions and postoperative complication rates of the two groups were compared by t test, Wilcoxon rank, χ2 test, or Fisher exact probability method. Results: Patients in IVMTE group had less intraoperative bleeding ((96.0±39.2) ml vs. (123.8±49.3) ml, t=-2.627, P=0.011), shorter operation time ((239.1±47.3) minutes vs. (264.2±57.2) minutes, t=-2.086, P=0.040), and less drainage 3 days after surgery (85(89) ml vs. 675(573) ml, Z=-7.575, P<0.01) compared with that of MIME group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of drainage tube-belt time, postoperative hospital stay, and lymph node dissection stations and numbers (all P>0.05). The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade 1 to 2 pulmonary infection (7.9%(3/38) vs. 31.6%(12/38), χ²=6.728, P=0.009), total complications (21.1%(8/38) vs. 47.4%(18/38), χ²=5.846, P=0.016) and total lung complications (13.2%(5/38) vs. 42.1%(16/38), χ²=7.962, P=0.005) in the IVMTE group were significantly lower. Conclusion: Inflatable video-assisted mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy combined with laparoscopic esophagectomy is safe and feasible, which can reach the same range of oncology as thoracoscopic surgery.

目的: 探讨充气式纵隔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌切除术的安全性与有效性。 方法: 回顾性分析安徽医科大学附属省立医院胸外科2017年9月至2021年12月收治的269例接受充气式纵隔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌切除术(IVMTE组)或胸腹腔镜联合微创Mckeown食管癌切除术(MIME组)的患者资料。IVMTE组47例,男性31例,女性16例,年龄(68.6±7.5)岁(范围:54~87岁);MIME组222例,男性159例,女性63例,年龄(66.8±8.8)岁(范围:42~93岁)。采用倾向性评分匹配法对两组患者进行1∶1匹配,匹配后MIME组38例,IVMTE组38例。采用t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验、χ2检验、Fisher确切概率法等比较两组患者术中情况和术后并发症发生率。 结果: IVMTE组患者术中出血量较少[(96.0±39.2)ml比(123.8±49.3)ml,t=-2.627,P=0.011],手术时间较短[(239.1±47.3)min比(264.2±57.2)min,t=-2.086,P=0.040],术后3 d引流量较少[85(89)ml比675(573)ml,Z=-7.575,P<0.01],差异有统计学意义。两组患者的引流管带管时间、术后住院时间,以及淋巴结清扫组数和枚数差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。IVMTE组Clavien-Dindo并发症分级系统1~2级肺部感染[7.9%(3/38)比31.6%(12/38),χ²=6.728,P=0.009]、总体并发症[21.1%(8/38)比47.4%(18/38),χ²=5.846,P=0.016]和肺部总并发症[13.2%(5/38)比42.1%(16/38),χ²=7.962,P=0.005]的发生率低于MIME组。 结论: 充气式纵隔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌切除术安全可行,可达到与胸腔镜手术相同的肿瘤学切除范围。.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Esophageal Neoplasms* / surgery
  • Esophagectomy / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy*
  • Lymph Node Excision / methods
  • Male
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Thoracoscopy
  • Treatment Outcome