Analysis of professional training in Multiprofessional Health Residency Programs in Brazil from the perspective of residents

Cien Saude Colet. 2023 Jan;28(1):281-290. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232023281.11292022. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
[Article in Portuguese, English]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze professional training in multiprofessional health residency programs (MHRPs) in primary care from the perspective of residents from 20 programs who had completed residency in the period 2015-2019. We undertook a cross-sectional study analyzing criteria in the dimensions Pedagogical Approach and In-Service Education Settings responded using a 10-point Likert scale. The study sample consisted of 365 graduates from MHRPs in 12 Brazilian states. The highest-scoring criteria in the dimension Pedagogical Approach (Cronbach's α=0.94) were broad concept of care and professional training oriented towards comprehensive care (P50=10). The lowest scoring criteria were those involving preceptorship (P50=7). With regard to the In-Service Education Settings dimension (Cronbach's α=0.90), the main strength was group educational activities (P50=9) and the main weaknesses were adequacy of the physical structure of health facilities (P50=6), participation of residents in local health committees (P50=6), and coordination with medical residency programs (P50=5). The findings show that professional training in MHRPs is aligned with the principles and guidelines underpinning Brazil's public health system, with emphasis on comprehensiveness and prevention. However, efforts are needed to improve preceptor training and address weaknesses in practice settings.

Objetivou-se analisar a formação em Programas de Residência Multiprofissional em Atenção Básica (PRMAB) no Brasil a partir dos egressos de 20 Programas no período de 2015 a 2019. Trata-se de um estudo transversal que analisou as dimensões Abordagem Pedagógica (AP) e Cenários de Educação em Serviço (CES) com escala do tipo Likert. Participaram do estudo 365 egressos de programas instalados em 12 estados da federação. Na dimensão AP (α de Cronbach=0,94) destacaram-se os critérios sobre a concepção ampliada do cuidado e formação pautada em cuidado integral (P50=10), enquanto os com pior desempenho se relacionavam à preceptoria (P50=7). Quanto aos CES (α de Cronbach=0,90), foram reveladas potencialidades para as atividades educativas em grupo (P50=9) e fragilidades para critérios relativos à suficiência de espaço físico nas unidades de saúde (P50=6), participação dos residentes em Conselhos (P50=6) e articulação com Programas de Residência Médica (P50=5). A formação nos PRMAB mostra-se sintonizada com os atuais paradigmas da atenção à saúde, com ênfase na integralidade e prevenção. Contudo, os Programas carecem de investimento na formação de preceptores e melhoria de fragilidades no âmbito dos cenários de prática.

MeSH terms

  • Brazil
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Health Promotion
  • Humans
  • Internship and Residency*
  • Preceptorship