Pediatric cardiac surgery requires perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) to reduce the risk of surgical site infections. However, the complexity of these procedures and the metabolic immaturity of children impede the establishment of PAP regimens that are both efficacious and in line with antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). In this study, we compared two PAP regimens: cefazolin with gentamicin (in a retrospective group) and cefazolin only (prospectively) in children undergoing elective cardiac surgery. In the prospective group, additional elements of AMS were introduced, i.e., restricted access to cefazolin and more diligent use of empirical antibiotics proceeded by consultation with an AMS team. The rate of surgical site infections (SSI), the scope of PAP deviations, and the postoperative use of antibiotics other than PAP within 30 days after surgery were analyzed. There were no significant differences in the rate of SSIs between the groups (3.9% vs. 1.2% in the prospective and retrospective groups, respectively (p = 0.35)). However, in the prospective group, the PAP violation was significantly reduced compared with the retrospective group (full compliance with the PAP regimen was 45.5% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, a reduction of postoperative antibiotic use was observed in the prospective group (0.991 vs. 1.932 defined daily doses, respectively).
Keywords: pediatric cardiac surgery; perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis; surgical site infection.