Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Rectal Cancer Patients from the Iowa Cancer Registry: Role of Hospital Volume and Tumor Location

J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun;27(6):1228-1237. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05656-2. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

Abstract

Background: Centralization of rectal cancer surgery has been associated with high-quality oncologic care. However, several patient, disease and system-related factors can impact where patients receive care. We hypothesized that patients with low rectal tumors would undergo treatment at high-volume centers and would be more likely to receive guideline-based multidisciplinary treatment.

Methods: Adults who underwent proctectomy for stage II/III rectal cancer were included from the Iowa Cancer Registry and supplemented with tumor location data. Multinomial logistic regression was employed to analyze factors associated with receiving care in high-volume hospital, while logistic regression for those associated with ≥ 12 lymph node yield, pre-operative chemoradiation and sphincter-preserving surgery.

Results: Of 414 patients, 38%, 39%, and 22% had low, mid, and high rectal cancers, respectively. Thirty-two percent were > 65 years, 38% female, and 68% had stage III tumors. Older age and rural residence, but not tumor location, were associated with surgical treatment in low-volume hospitals. Higher tumor location, high-volume, and NCI-designated hospitals had higher nodal yield (≥ 12). Hospital-volume was not associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation rates or circumferential resection margin status. Sphincter-sparing surgery was independently associated with high tumor location, female sex, and stage III cancer, but not hospital volume.

Conclusions: Low tumor location was not associated with care in high-volume hospitals. High-volume and NCI-designated hospitals had higher nodal yields, but not significantly higher neoadjuvant chemoradiation, negative circumferential margin, or sphincter preservation rates. Therefore, providing educational/quality improvement support in lower volume centers may be more pragmatic than attempting to centralize rectal cancer care among high-volume centers.

Keywords: Hospital Volume; Outcomes; Rectal Cancer; Rural Surgery; Tumor Location.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anal Canal* / surgery
  • Female
  • Hospitals, High-Volume
  • Humans
  • Iowa / epidemiology
  • Male
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Organ Sparing Treatments
  • Rectal Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Rectal Neoplasms* / surgery
  • Registries
  • Retrospective Studies