Introduction: In recent years, the role of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before endovascular stroke treatment (EVT) has been discussed intensively. Whether the discussion was accompanied by changing rates of bridging IVT is unknown.
Methods: Data were extracted from the prospectively maintained German Stroke Registry, including patients treated with EVT at one of 28 stroke centers in Germany between 2016 and 2021. Primary outcome parameters were the rate of bridging IVT (a) in the entire registry cohort and (b) in patients without formal contraindications to IVT (i.e. recent oral anticoagulants, time window ⩾4.5 h, extensive early ischemic changes) adjusted for demographic and clinical confounders.
Results: 10,162 patients (52.8% women, median age 77 years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 14) were analyzed. In the entire cohort, the rate of bridging IVT decreased from 63.8% in 2016 to 43.6% in 2021 (average absolute annual decrease 3.1%, 95% CI 2.4%-3.8%), while the proportion of patients with at least one formal contraindication increased by only 1.2% annually (95% CI 0.6%-1.9%). Among 5460 patients without record of formal contraindications, the rate of bridging IVT decreased from 75.5% in 2016 to 63.2% in 2021 and was significantly associated with admission date in a multivariable model (average absolute annual decrease 1.4%, 95% CI 0.6%-2.2%). Clinical factors associated with lower odds of bridging IVT included diabetes mellitus, carotid-T-occlusion, dual antiplatelet therapy, and direct admission to a thrombectomy center.
Conclusion: We observed a substantial decline in bridging IVT rates independent of demographic confounders and not explained by an increase in contraindications. This observation deserves further exploration in independent populations.
Keywords: Ischemic stroke; acute reperfusion treatment; clinical decision making; endovascular treatment; large vessel occlusion; thrombectomy; thrombolysis.